May Day is a Good Time to Talk About Robots and Labour

May 1, 2016 – Traditionally in much of the Western World there are two days every year that celebrate labour. May 1st and the first Monday in September. So I thought it appropriate to look at what progress we are making in the interaction between the burgeoning growth in robots in the workforce and their co-laborers, the humans.

When robots were first introduced into production lines they were single purpose automatons such as those on automotive assembly lines doing spot welding or repetitive builds. These robots were simple servomechanisms programmed to do one thing and do it precisely and repeatedly with no human intervention. But with the onset of robots like Baxter, a multi-purpose, teachable robot, calling the machine a simple servomechanism is no longer apt.

So what is the current and near future state of human-robot interaction in manufacturing and service industries? Professor Thomas Sheridan of MIT addresses this subject in a paper appearing on April 20, 2016 in the journal, Human Factors. Entitled, Human-Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges, it looks at current research from a human factors perspective. In a Kurzweil News summary of the paper it poses the question “Would you trust this robot?”  under the picture below showing Baxter working side-by-side with a human.

Among the concerns raised when talking about robot-human interaction is safety. Sheridan talks about Baxter, a product of Rethink Robotics, a Boston company. Baxter is designed to work in close proximity to humans. Baxter isn’t going to swing his arms and connect with the head of the human next to him causing damage. But Baxter doesn’t intuitively know how to do a task along with a human laborer. Instead he has to be taught. For this purpose Baxter is mechanically compliant. His display is designed to communicate to the humans with whom he is working. And his co-laborers don’t have to be programmers to teach Baxter. They can show him how to do a task by moving his arms and body to teach the robot a job. As such Baxter represents the leading edge of human-robot interaction a new field where general purpose automata can be trained by human laborers to work with them.

In Sheridan’s paper he covers the full range of robot-human interactions including:

• The social, for example Kismet, a robot that you can read more about from a posting on this site back in 2009, to the considerate, charming and thoughtful Pepper, also the subject of a previous blog. Robots designed for social interaction have the capability of becoming home companions for both young and old.
• The medical, surgical robots like DaVinci give suregons greater precision to do minimally invasive procedures.
• Robots that can work in hazardous environments autonomously or with the assistance of human remote operators, saving the latter from exposure to life-threatening contaminants or injury.
• Autonomous systems that relieve pilots of most of their flying responsibility through application of sophisticated flight management systems that monitor on board sensors, control pitch, roll and yaw, communicate with external navigational aids such as GPS, and ensure airplanes get to their destinations safely.
• From human control to autonomous control in automobiles and trucks through development of vehicle-to-vehicle communication, self-navigation, and vehicles capable of providing on demand point-to-point transit.
• Fully automated transit systems that can safely take over from human operators and that understand the conditions ahead along loop-circuited tracks.
• Trains that require minimal human intervention, capable of assessing track conditions for safely operating and navigating an entire rail network using the same machine-to-machine technology being deployed for autonomous cars.
• Spaceflight using robotic spacecraft, landers and rovers that work with remote human operators but also have the intelligence to do independent assessment and decision making based on local encountered conditions.

In his assessment of human-robot interactions Sheridan raises the issue that robots may enhance work and not be the dreaded job stealers that are described in the press today. Those headlines that warn us of the millions who will no longer be employable may prove to be fantasy as humans and robots assist each other in the workplace both in the present and near future.

Related articles across the web

• Robots may be able to lift, drive, and chat, but are they safe and trustworthy?
• Would You Trust A Robot To Rescue You From A Burning Building?